USPTO serial 78950379
UPG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UPG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan M. Fogelman
Evan M. Fogelman Underwood, Perkins & Ralston, P.C.5420 LBJ Freeway, Lincoln Centre TwoSuite 1900Dallas, TX 75240Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal mechanic workstation accessories in the nature of metal truck steps; 12 volt automotive accessories in the nature of batteries; marine kits featuring battery pack and charger; hunting kits featuring batter pack and charger. | ACTIVE | May 4, 2006 |
| 008 | Hand tools, namely electric razors. | ACTIVE | May 4, 2006 |
| 025 | Coats, jackets, pants, shirts and hats with light diodes | ACTIVE | May 4, 2006 |
| 028 | Spotlights, automotive and marine jumpstarters, marine kits, hunting kits, flashlights and electric scooters | ACTIVE | May 4, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Power Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named UPG
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |