Drawing for SMARTOPTIMIZATION

USPTO serial 78953400

SMARTOPTIMIZATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3648950Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 30, 2009
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SMARTOPTIMIZATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina N. Pham

Christina N. Pham Alerding Castor Hewitt LLP47 S. Pennsylvania Street, Suite 700Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing on-line non-downloadable software for analyzing competitive bidding results to determine optimal combination of suppliers, products and services for business objectives, risk aversion tactics, quality standards and supply base consolidationSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 6, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2020CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Apr 24, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Apr 17, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 30, 2018REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Feb 8, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 8, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 28, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Mar 4, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Oct 4, 2014NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED
Oct 4, 2014C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 4, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 30, 2014E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 30, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 26, 2009FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE
May 22, 2009ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED
May 20, 2009REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 20, 2009CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Mar 24, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 24, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 24, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 24, 2009SNEASU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN
Oct 10, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 10, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2008CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2008CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 7, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 14, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Mar 14, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 10, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 10, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 24, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Aug 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance