USPTO serial 78953710
DENIZEN GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENIZEN GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Severna Park, MD
Ellicott City, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C. Weinblatt
Richard C. Weinblatt Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLCTwo Fox Point Centre6 Denny Road, Suite 307Wilmington, DE 19809Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Television advertising agencies; providing television advertising for others; promotion, advertising and marketing of on-line websites; on-line advertising on computer communication networks; advertising via electronic media and specifically the Internet; advertising through all public communication means; cooperative advertising and marketing services by way of solicitation, customer service and providing marketing information via websites on a global computer network; cooperative advertising and marketing; electronic commerce services, namely providing information products via telecommunication networks for advertising and sales purposes; preparing audio-visual presentations for use in advertising; preparation and realization of media and advertising plans and concepts; electronic billboard advertising; distribution of products for advertising purposes; distribution and dissemination of advertising materials namely, leaflets, prospectuses, samples, brochures, and printed material; dissemination of advertising matter; direct marketing advertising for others; direct mail advertising; cinema advertising; arranging and conducting of fairs and exhibitions for business and advertising purposes; advertising, marketing and promotion services; advertising services, namely, creating corporate and brand identity for others; advertising services, namely, creating corporate logos for others; advertising flyer distribution; advertising consultation; advertising and publicity services, namely, promoting the goods, services, brand identity and commercial information and news of third parties through print, audio, video, digital and on-line medium; advertising and publicity services; advertising and promotion services and related consulting; advertising and marketing; advertising and commercial information services, via the Internet; advertising and business services, namely securing airtime on all forms of media communications stations, systems, networks, and services for the purpose of promoting the goods and services of others; advertising and business management consultancy; advertising and advertisement services; advertising agencies, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; advertising agencies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |