Drawing for WATCHKEEPER

USPTO serial 78956992

WATCHKEEPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUONG, ANGELA GAW
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WATCHKEEPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil K. Nydegger

NEIL K. NYDEGGER NYDEGGER & ASSOCIATES348 OLIVE STSAN DIEGO, CA 92103-6216UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric or electronic security, surveillance and alarm systems, namely cameras and alarms for monitoring an area and for capturing still and video images of the monitored area, and portable, battery-powered sensors for sensing motion in the monitored areaABANDONEDJun 15, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Dec 1, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Dec 1, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 1, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Nov 1, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 5, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 8, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 1, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 1, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 1, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 29, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Aug 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance