USPTO serial 78958532
ARICENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 2010
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ARICENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GRAND CAYMAN, KY
GRAND CAYMAN, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
Perry J. Viscounty Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, 20th FloorCosta Mesa, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for operating and integrating wire line, wireless, cable and satellite equipment and devices; computer software for communication infrastructures, equipment or devices that enables communication, namely, communications software for transmitting data for connectivity of telecommunications equipment between routers, switches, wireless base stations, server-side software applications, and client-side software applications on devices including wireless handsets, desktop and portable computers, wire line telephones, televisions, computer displays, set-top boxes, networked surveillance equipment, and radio frequency identification devices; computer software for transmitting data to users of hand-held computers | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2006 |
| 042 | Computer software design services for others; licensing of computer software; computer software research and development services; installation of computer software; updating of computer software for others; computer programming; maintenance of computer software; and consultancy in the field of computer software | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARICENT
- Other trademarks owned by ARICENT GROUP
- Other trademarks owned by Aricent Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Aricent Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Software Development Group
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARICENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |