USPTO serial 78960212
FLIRTY 30
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLIRTY 30?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore J. Minch
THEODORE J. MINCH SOVICH MINCH, LLP10099 CHESAPEAKE DR STE 100MC CORDSVILLE, IN 46055-9579UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aloe vera gel for cosmetic purposes; Astringents for cosmetic purposes; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Beauty creams; Beauty creams for body care; Beauty gels; Beauty lotions; Beauty masks; Beauty milks; Beauty serums; Bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Body and beauty care preparations; Cleansing creams; Cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes; Coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes; Concealers; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Cosmetic suntan lotions; Cosmetics; Cosmetics, namely, lip primer; Face and body beauty creams; Face creams for cosmetic use; Facial beauty masks; Foams containing cosmetics and sunscreens; Perfume oils for the manufacture of cosmetic preparations; Shampoos; Soaps; Toners | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |