USPTO serial 78961441
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Schiltach, DE
Schiltach, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leon E. Redman
Leon E. Redman MASCO CORPORATION21001 VAN BORN RDTAYLOR, MI 48180-1300UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL ROBE HOOKS, METAL SHOWER GRAB BARS AND METAL DOOR AND CABINET HARDWARE, NAMELY, KNOBS, PULLS AND HANDLE LATCHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | FAUCETS, NAMELY, LAVATORY FAUCETS, KITCHEN FAUCETS, FAUCET HANDLES, FAUCET VALVES, BAR SINK FAUCETS, ROMAN TUB FAUCETS AND FAUCET FILTERS; SHOWER AND TUB FIXTURES, NAMELY, SHOWER HEADS, HAND-HELD SHOWERS AND SLIDE BARS THEREFOR; BODY SPRAYS, NAMELY, SHOWER SPRAYERS; SHOWER VALVES, TUB/SHOWER VALVES, TUB/SHOWER DIVERTER VALVES, TUB SPOUTS, TUB WASTE ASSEMBLIES; SINKS; SWIVEL SPRAY FAUCET AERATORS, FAUCET AERATORS, KITCHEN DECK FAUCET SPRAYERS; BIDETS AND PARTS THEREFOR; TOILET TANK FLUSH LEVERS; AND INTEGRATED LIQUID DISPENSERS INCORPORATED INTO THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS AND SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH; SHOWER HEAD COMPONENTS, NAMELY, NON-METAL WALL AND HAND SHOWER CONNECTORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | NON-METAL HOSES FOR PLUMBING | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | BATHROOM ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, TOWEL BARS, TOWEL RINGS, TOOTHBRUSH HOLDERS, TOILET TISSUE HOLDERS, SOAP DISHES, CUP HOLDERS, LIQUID SOAP DISPENSERS, AND SHOWER ACCESSORY HOLDERS, NAMELY, SHOWER CADDIES, DRAIN STOPPERS FOR SINKS AND DRAINS AND QUICK CONNECTOR ADAPTERS FOR ADJUSTING THE SIZE OF THE DRAIN STOPPERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |