USPTO serial 78961930
Q-SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Q-SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Joseph Schaeff
B JOSEPH SCHAEFF DINSMORE & SHOHL LLPONE DAYTON CTR ONE S MAIN ST STE 1300DAYTON, OH 45402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cables, namely, computer cables, patch cords, fiber optic cables, power cables, audio cables, video cables, audio/video cables; cable connectors, cable leads and cable couplers; and replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |