Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78965723?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78965723. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns PIZZA PUFFS?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78965723, the listed owner(s) include: Illinois Tamale Co., Illinois Tamale Co., Illinois Tamale Co..

What is USPTO serial number 78965723?

Serial number 78965723 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark PIZZA PUFFS. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of PIZZA PUFFS?

PIZZA PUFFS (78965723) currently shows USPTO status code 790 on the public record. This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Which trademark classes cover PIZZA PUFFS?

The public record lists International Classes: 029, 030. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78965723

PIZZA PUFFS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3628959Status 790Registered

Filing date: Sep 1, 2006
Status date: Nov 7, 2024
Registration date: May 26, 2009
Examiner: FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office: GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PIZZA PUFFS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Illinois Tamale Co.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by Illinois Tamale Co.
Illinois Tamale Co.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by Illinois Tamale Co.
Illinois Tamale Co.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by Illinois Tamale Co.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIN WESTBROOK

ERIN WESTBROOK SAUL EWING LLP33 SOUTH SIXTH STREETSUITE 4750MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
029	Food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat, vegetables [ and/or processed fruit; sausages; ham; cheese; cheese substitutes; processed cheese; processed mushrooms; tomato paste; pork; frozen vegetables, namely, green peppers, onions, mushroom, spinach, and/or tomatoes ]; processed vegetables; frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, cheese or vegetables; prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, cheese or vegetables; packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, cheese or vegetables, frozen meat; [ meat; prepared meat; processed meat; prepared beef; eggs; poultry; chicken; turkey ]	ACTIVE	Dec 10, 1979
030	Processed foods, namely, Italian style burritos; dough-based pockets with filling consisting primarily of meats, vegetables, and/or cheese; dough enclosed sandwich with fillings of cheese, sausage, pepperoni, beef, ground beef, [ ham, ] pork, peppers, [ Jalapeno peppers, scrambled eggs, ] tomato sauce, and/or vegetables, namely, spinach, tomatoes, peppers, onions, and/or mushrooms; fillings of meat, cheese, sauce, vegetables and/or seasonings encased in dough; burritos; [ tacos; tamales; tomato sauce, pepper spice; ] pastries; pasties filled with meat, vegetables, and/or cheese; dough enrobed stuffed sandwiches; tarts; ready to [ eat ] heat pasties and tarts for preparation in a toaster, deep fryer, frying pan, microwave or oven; handheld toaster pastries; microwave pastries; [ frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; refrigerated meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; ] stuffed sandwiches comprised of fillings enrobed in pastry or dough; sandwiches; meat pies	ACTIVE	Dec 10, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Nov 7, 2024	PETC	CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999	—
Dec 14, 2019	TMBN	TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS	—
Dec 14, 2019	CANT	CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999	—
Dec 14, 2019	CAND	CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999	—
Jul 2, 2019	NA89	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED	—
Jul 2, 2019	RNL1	REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)	The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 2, 2019	89AG	REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED	The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 2, 2019	APRE	CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL	—
May 24, 2019	E89R	TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED	—
May 24, 2019	CORV	REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED	—
May 24, 2019	EWAF	TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS	—
Aug 21, 2018	NOSU	NOTICE OF SUIT	—
Aug 6, 2018	PETC	CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999	—
May 26, 2018	REM2	COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED	—
Nov 3, 2017	NOSU	NOTICE OF SUIT	—
Nov 23, 2015	NA85	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED	—
Nov 23, 2015	C15A	REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.	—
Nov 20, 2015	APRE	CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL	—
Sep 30, 2015	E815	TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED	—
May 26, 2009	R.PR	REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER	Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2009	REGV	LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Apr 21, 2009	CNPR	ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED	—
Apr 2, 2009	SUPC	STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Apr 2, 2009	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Mar 13, 2009	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Mar 13, 2009	EISU	TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED	The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 10, 2009	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2008	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2008	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Oct 15, 2008	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Oct 14, 2008	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Oct 1, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 1, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 29, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2008	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Aug 25, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 12, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 19, 2008	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Apr 30, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Apr 30, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2008	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Apr 2, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 31, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 19, 2007	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Oct 19, 2007	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2007	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Sep 13, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 13, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Aug 9, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 10, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Sep 7, 2006	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—