USPTO serial 78975060
DI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2007
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ PRERECORDED VIDEO TAPES FEATURING TEAM-BASED CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING FOR STUDENTS FROM KINDERGARTEN THROUGH COLLEGE; PRERECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTES FEATURING TEAM-BASED CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING FOR STUDENTS FROM KINDERGARTEN THROUGH COLLEGE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE USE OF SCORING IN THE FIELD OF TEAM-BASED CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING FOR STUDENTS FROM KINDERGARTEN THROUGH COLLEGE AND USER MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT ] | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1999 |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF PROBLEM-SOLVING TOURNAMENTS FOR CHILDREN PRESCHOOL THROUGH COLLEGE IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATIONAL AND CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING, AND DISTRIBUTION OF PROGRAMMATIC MATERIALS EMPHASIZING CREATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DESTINATION IMAGINATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DESTINATION IMAGINATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DESTINATION IMAGINATION, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2026 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |