USPTO serial 78975092
SMALL FRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMALL FRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Alpharetta, GA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Children, infant and toddler furniture in wood, plastic and vinyl namely, book shelves, book cases, desks, tables, chairs, sofas, mattresses, toy chests, changing tables, stools, benches, playpens, pillows, cushions, cribs, bumper guards for cribs, and bedroom furniture, namely beds, dressers, chests of drawers, nightstands, dressing tables and entertainment centers | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textile items for infants, toddlers and children namely, towels, wash cloths, pillow cases, bed sheets, comforters, blankets, drapes for use over windows, curtains and bedspreads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |