USPTO serial 78975096
STEEL24-7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2823595Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 16, 2004
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STEEL24-7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Puteaux, FR
Puteaux, FR
Puteaux, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | STEELS IN THE FORM OF SHEETS, PLATES, STRIPS AND COILS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |