USPTO serial 78975107
PHYSICIAN ENDORSED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHYSICIAN ENDORSED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SUNGLASSES | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |