USPTO serial 78975330
PLAY THINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLAY THINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | PET TREATS | ACTIVE | Nov 19, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |