USPTO serial 78975334
RISKDATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2956364Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2005
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RISKDATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leigh Ann Lindquist
Leigh Ann Lindquist SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software to automate data warehousing; database management software; computer communications software to allow customers to access database; computer search engine software to select data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 26, 2002 |
| 036 | Financial portfolio management, optimized according to performance and risk management indicators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |