USPTO serial 78975345
REPORT SEATTLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REPORT SEATTLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William O. Ferron, Jr.
WILLIAM O FERRON JR SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLL701 FIFTH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE WA, 98104 7092U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |