Drawing for REPORT SEATTLE

USPTO serial 78975345

REPORT SEATTLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REPORT SEATTLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025footwearACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 13, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 13, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 15, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 4, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
May 4, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Mar 10, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 1, 2004GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Dec 1, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 9, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 8, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 25, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 17, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 12, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance