Drawing for WHOLESOME HARVEST

USPTO serial 78975424

WHOLESOME HARVEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3327990Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2007
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHOLESOME HARVEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh vegetablesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDFeb 21, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2011C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
Jun 9, 2011CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 25, 2011CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
Feb 11, 2011UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Dec 21, 2010PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 30, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 26, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 17, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Aug 26, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 23, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jul 23, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 8, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 19, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 12, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 11, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 20, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 28, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance