Drawing for M MEUSSDOERFFER-MALZ

USPTO serial 78975652

M MEUSSDOERFFER-MALZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M MEUSSDOERFFER-MALZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031MALT FOR BREWERIES AND DISTILLERIESACTIVEFeb 1, 1901

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jun 29, 2005PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED
Apr 11, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 27, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Sep 9, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 9, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 18, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance