Drawing for D DIVEMEX

USPTO serial 78975744

D DIVEMEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 622
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
UNKNOWN

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with D DIVEMEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh fruits and vegetablesACTIVEJan 15, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 19, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 5, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 4, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 31, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance