USPTO serial 78975910
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ernst-Ruijs, Evelyne Henriette
3632 El Loenen ann de Vecht, NL
Ernst-Ruijs, Evelyne Henriette
3632 El Loenen ann de Vecht, NL
Ernst-Ruijs, Evelyne Henriette
3632 El Loenen ann de Vecht, NL
LOENEN AAN DE VECHT, NL
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | MULTIPURPOSE LEATHER AND ARTIFICIAL LEATHER TRAVEL, CARE, TOTE, SHOPPING BAGS, SPORT BAGS, PACKS, AND SUITCASES, NAMELY BACKPACK, RUCKSACK, SPORT BAG, SPORT EQUIPMENT TOTE, SHOULDER BAG, BABY CARE BAG, DIAPER BAG, NURSERY BAG, YOUTH TOTE, YOUTH BACKPACK, FANNY PACK, ACCESSORIES CARRYING BAG, STORAGE TOTE, SLING TOTE, SUITCASE, SUIT BAG, AND OVERNIGHT BAG | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 20, 2002 |
| 021 | THERMAL INSULATED TOTE BAGS FOR FOOD OR BEVERAGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |