USPTO serial 78976074
INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING AND BRAIN SCIENCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 2006
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING AND BRAIN SCIENCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher S. Beer
215 NE 40th, Suite C3SEATTLE, WA 98105United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing seminars, workshops and conferences in the fields of learning, behavioral development, cognitive development, social development, emotional development, language development and brain development, and providing daycare training, preschool training, educational training, language training and teacher training related thereto | ACTIVE | Oct 3, 2003 |
| 042 | Technical consulting services in the fields of learning, behavioral development, cognitive development, social development, emotional development, language development and brain development | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by University of Washington
- Other trademarks owned by University of Washington
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING AND BRAIN SCIENCES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 2, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 2, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 23, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |