Drawing for FREQUENCY

USPTO serial 78976173

FREQUENCY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREQUENCY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, mirrors, picture frames, shelves, figurines made of ivory, plaster, plastic, wax or wood; non-metal nameplates, metal newspaper display stands, plaques, plastic signboards, statues and statuettes made of ivory, plaster, plastic, wax or wood; drawer pulls made of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum or plasticsACTIVE—
021Household and kitchen utensils, namely, spatulas, strainers, sieves; all purpose household containers; serving traysACTIVE—
024Bath, bed and table linen; fitted fabric bed covers, bed blankets, bed sheets, pillow cases, cushion covers, mattress covers, quilts, pillow shams; storage cases for mattresses and for sleeping garments, fitted fabric covers for toilet seats, fitted fabric table covers, textile table napkins, towels and table mats not of paper; curtain and draperies; sleeping bags and sleeping sacks; fabrics for the manufacture of wearing apparelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 16, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 4, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance