USPTO serial 78976184
HEALTHY HANDFULS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3036874Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2005
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEALTHY HANDFULS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
FRAMINGHAM, MA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Packaged snack food product, namely, cookies, crackers, pretzels, cereal-based snack foods, rice-based snack foods, wheat-based snack foods, and granola-based snack bars; Snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 4, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reynolds, Deborah G.
- Other trademarks owned by Reynolds, Deborah G.
- Other trademarks owned by SOLBERG, GWENDOLYN G.
- Other trademarks owned by SOLBERG, GWENDOLYN G.
- Other trademarks owned by ELEVATION BRANDS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HEALTHY HANDFULS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HEALTHY HANDFULS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named HEALTHY HANDFULS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |