USPTO serial 78976438
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3076823Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 4, 2006
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ANCASTER, CA
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.
ANCASTER ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.
ANCASTER ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.
ANCASTER ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele Ballagh
Michele Ballagh Ballagh & Edward LLP175 Longwood Road South Suite 102Hamilton, Ontario,CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for screening, assessing and diagnosing effective product innovation and portfolio management in the field of innovation and new product development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION, NAMELY ASSISTING OTHERS IN IMPLEMENTING A MODEL OR SYSTEM FOR INNOVATION AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TRAINING COURSES, LECTURES, SEMINARS AND ONSITE TRAINING TO OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF INNOVATION AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | DESIGNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS FOR THE PURPOSE OF SCREENING, ASSESSING AND DIAGNOSING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH; AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF INNOVATION AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STAGE-GATE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 4, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |