USPTO serial 78976538
APPRECIATE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3042910Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2006
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with APPRECIATE INTANGIBLE ASSETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MITCH TUCHMAN
MITCH TUCHMAN WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLCP O BOX 13069RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online nondownloadable computer software for processing information provided by others related to intangible assets and valuation of intangible assets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Plucker, Jean-Francois
- Other trademarks owned by Plucker, Jean-Francois
- Other trademarks owned by Plucker, Jean-Francois
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named APPRECIATE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |