USPTO serial 78976769
DENTAL LEARNING RESOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENTAL LEARNING RESOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed educational materials sold or otherwise furnished to administrators of secondary schools, administrators of vocational/technical schools and administrators of community colleges and other institutions of learning, namely, books containing lesson plans and tests, pamphlets containing lesson plans and tests; printed guides for administrators of such schools, community colleges and other institutions of learning featuring information about the purchase of equipment and the hiring of personnel to be used in teaching students to become dental assistants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |