USPTO serial 78976875
DMAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3522751Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2008
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DMAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NOVITEX ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, INC.
STAMFORD, CT
Other trademarks owned by NOVITEX ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Pitnety Bowes Management Services, Inc.
Stamford, CT
Other trademarks owned by Pitnety Bowes Management Services, Inc.
Pitnety Bowes Management Services, Inc.
Stamford, CT
Other trademarks owned by Pitnety Bowes Management Services, Inc.
Pitnety Bowes Management Services, Inc.
Stamford, CT
Other trademarks owned by Pitnety Bowes Management Services, Inc.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mail sorting, handling, and receiving incoming physical mail pieces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 11, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NOVITEX ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Pitnety Bowes Management Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pitnety Bowes Management Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pitnety Bowes Management Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named DMAIL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 22, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |