USPTO serial 78976902
NAVIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3134430Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2006
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NAVIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CUPERTINO, CA
CUPERTINO, CA
CUPERTINO, CA
Cupertino, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | * Providing online non-downloadable * Software to allow businesses and consumers to send and receive electronic messages via fixed line and wireless networks; *online downloadable e-commerce* [ c-commerce ] software to allow businesses and consumers to perform business transactions via a global computer network; * online non-downloadable* software to secure electronic communications, business transactions, and digital content on computers and mobile devices including personal digital assistants and mobile phones, excluding computer software for navigation control and for the automation and control of boats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 27, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NAVIO SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NAVIO SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NAVIO SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Aplaud Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NAVIO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | XAAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AFTER PUB APPROVAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |