CopyMark Law Group
4.9
Drawing for VIRGINIA CITY BREWING COMPANY

USPTO serial 78977032

VIRGINIA CITY BREWING COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3168813Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 7, 2006
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRGINIA CITY BREWING COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Malt Beverages, both Alcoholic and Non-Alcoholic namely Beer, Ale, Lager, Malt Liquor and StoutSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJan 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2019C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jul 16, 2019CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 15, 2019CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Sep 19, 2018PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 22, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 22, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 22, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 9, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 14, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 7, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 26, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance