Drawing for TOYS & JOYS

USPTO serial 78977037

TOYS & JOYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOYS & JOYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Wholesale distributorships featuring toys and gifts that schools use for fundraisingACTIVEJan 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 25, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 29, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 29, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 28, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 16, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 1, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 31, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Oct 31, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
May 4, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 3, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 14, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED
Feb 6, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 6, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 6, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 3, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance