USPTO serial 78977190
J. J. YELEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3214408Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 27, 2007
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with J. J. YELEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntersville, NC
Huntersville, NC
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal key chains | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2004 |
| 014 | Clocks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2004 |
| 016 | Bumper stickers; decals; postcards; pressure sensitive graphics for application to automobiles; printed paper signs; static decals; and trading cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 019 | Non-luminous/non-mechanical/non-metal signs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 020 | Non-metal key chains; Plastic novelty license plates; and plastic pennants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 021 | Insulated sleeve holders for beverage cans | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2004 |
| 024 | Cloth flags; Cloth pennants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2004 |
| 025 | Caps; jerseys; t-shirts; and tops | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 026 | Belt buckles of non-precious metals; clothing accessories, namely, buckles, buttons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 028 | Toy model car kits and collectible miniature model vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 035 | Rental of advertising space to others on racing stock cars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Yeley, J. J.
- Other trademarks owned by Yeley, J. J.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named J. J. YELEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |