USPTO serial 78977236
BIONATUR GREENHOUSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3358099Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2007
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIONATUR GREENHOUSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bionatur Invernaderos Biologicos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V
Jocotitlan, MX
Other trademarks owned by Bionatur Invernaderos Biologicos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V
Bionatur Invernaderos Biologicos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V
Jocotitlan, MX
Other trademarks owned by Bionatur Invernaderos Biologicos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V
Bionatur Invernaderos Biologicos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V
Jocotitlan, MX
Other trademarks owned by Bionatur Invernaderos Biologicos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products, namely, fresh fruits and vegetables; living plants and natural flowers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 16, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bionatur Invernaderos Biologicos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V
- Other trademarks owned by Bionatur Invernaderos Biologicos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V
- Other trademarks owned by Bionatur Invernaderos Biologicos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named BIONATUR GREENHOUSES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |