USPTO serial 78977429
RETAIL DIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3160975Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RETAIL DIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GARDA CL TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
PASADENA, CA
Pasadena, CA
Pasadena, CA
Pasadena, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANNE WANG
ANNE WANG CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE LLP350 W COLORADO BLVD STE 500PASADENA CA, 91105U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MONEY AFFAIRS, NAMELY, DEPOSIT VERIFICATION, CURRENCY AND COIN PROCESSING AND WRAPPING AND CHANGING SERVICES; AND PROVIDING ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF FUNDS AFTER VERIFICATION OF DEPOSITS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2004 |
| 039 | ARMORED CAR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR COINS, CURRENCY AND OTHER VALUABLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GARDA CL TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AT Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AT Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AT Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named RETAIL DIRECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 24, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |