CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NOURISHING PARTNERSHIPS IN HEALTH CARE BETWEEN PATIENTS AND THEIR DOCTORS

USPTO serial 78977695

NOURISHING PARTNERSHIPS IN HEALTH CARE BETWEEN PATIENTS AND THEIR DOCTORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3256520Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2007
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with NOURISHING PARTNERSHIPS IN HEALTH CARE BETWEEN PATIENTS AND THEIR DOCTORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lee Kim, Ralph F. Manning

THOMAS LIZZI TUCKER ARENSBERG PCONE PPG PL STE 1500PITTSBURGH, PA 15222UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Consulting services in the field of tracking and monitoring patient health parametersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 27, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jun 26, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance