USPTO serial 78977716
GOLD RUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3578142Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2009
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLD RUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Moore
Debi Coleman-Dabbs Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc.245 N. Beverly DriveBeverly Hills, CA 90210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs and television specials in the field of reality television | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 13, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UAMG CONTENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by JMBP, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by JMBP, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by JMBP, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ONE THREE TELEVISION, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GOLD RUSH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2015 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |