USPTO serial 78977799
RUEHL NO.925 GREENWICH STREET NEW YORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3199845Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2007
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RUEHL NO.925 GREENWICH STREET NEW YORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Albany, OH
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING CO.
NEW ALBANY, OH
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING CO.
NEW ALBANY, OH
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING CO.
NEW ALBANY, OH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, belts, blazers, blouses, boxer shorts, [ bras, ] camisoles, caps, coats, dresses, halter tops, hats, jackets, jeans, [ jogging suits, ] knit shirts, knit tops, [ panties, ] pants, sandals, scarves, shirts, shoes, shorts, skirts, [ slacks, ] sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweat shorts, [ sweat suits, ] sweaters, swimsuits, t-shirts, tank tops, underpants, undershirts, underwear and vests | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by A & F Trademark, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named RUEHL NO.925 GREENWICH STREET NEW YORK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |