USPTO serial 78977876
FLUIDIQS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3211971Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 20, 2007
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLUIDIQS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Control Manufacturing Corporation
Napa Valley, CA
Control Manufacturing Corporation
Newport Beach, CA
Control Manufacturing Corporation
Newport Beach, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of computer networks; installation of electronic communications and computer systems; installation of instrumentation, control equipment and computer networks; maintenance services regarding computer hardware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 2005 |
| 042 | Systems integration, engineering and consulting services pertaining to information technology systems, automation, manufacturing, processing control systems for manufacturing processing facilities and municipal industrial, and other water and waste treatment distribution, and other plants and facilities namely, providing services namely, engineering services, integration services, field services; computer software maintenance services and consulting services regarding computer hardware and software; computer software programming for others; integration of computers and control equipment; computer network design for others; installation of computer software; technical support, namely, providing back-up computer programs and facilities in plants; technical support, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; technical support, namely, troubleshooting of industrial process control computer software problems; technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems; design of electronic communications and computer systems for others; data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect service data and monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Control Manufacturing Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Control Manufacturing Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Control Manufacturing Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FLUIDIQS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |