USPTO serial 78978107
POKER CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POKER CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winter Park, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil D. Greenstein
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Cable television transmission; Pay-per-view television transmission services; television broadcasting services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | Cable television transmission; distribution of television programming; Entertainment in the nature of television series; Entertainment namely, production of television shows and operation of television channels; Pay-per-view television transmission services; Production of cable television programs; Television production services; Television broadcasting services; Television program syndication; Gaming services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2006 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |