USPTO serial 78978123
DATAWRITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3272483Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2007
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DATAWRITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edinburgh, Midlothian, GB
Edinburgh, Midlothian, GB
Edinburgh, Midlothian, GB
NEWBRIDGE, EDINBURGH, LOTHIANS, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | [ Filled inkjet cartridges ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Blank CD-R, DVD-R, DVD+R, DVD-RW, DVD-I-RW and floppy discs; unfilled inkjet cartridges for photocopy machines or computer printers; carrying cases and storage boxes, wallets and sleeves for CDs, DVDs and floppy discs; computer hardware for writing, duplication and playing back media; DVD/CD duplicators, drives and players, cases for CDs, DVDs; containers, trays, files, racking and shelves, all specifically adapted for the storage, display and transportation of magnetic discs, magnetic diskettes, magnetic tapes, magnetic cards, and cassettes and cartridges for the use therewith; cardboard carrying cases, storage boxes, wallets and sleeves for storage and transportation of all forms of optical storage media; and plastic, wood and metal carrying cases and storage boxes for storage and transportation of all forms of optical storage media, parts for all of the aforesaid goods | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Datasafe-Media Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Datasafe-Media Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Datasafe-Media Limited
- Other trademarks owned by DATA SAFE-MEDIA LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DATAWRITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |