USPTO serial 78978180
WEPLAY SPORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEPLAY SPORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Painesville, OH
Painesville, OH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Sporting goods and equipment, namely, basketball bags, basketballs, basketball backboards, basketball hoops and nets; athletic tape, ankle protectors, boxing gloves; skin diving and snorkeling fins, skin diving and snorkeling sets comprising fins, masks and snorkels sold as a unit; field hockey bags, shin guards, field hockey sticks, field hockey balls, mouth guards, street hockey balls, goals for ice, street and field hockey, hockey sticks for ice, street and field hockey, hockey skates for ice, street and field hockey, hockey blades for ice, street or field hockey; lacrosse balls, lacrosse bags, lacrosse gloves, lacrosse pads, lacrosse sticks, lacrosse replacement shafts, lacrosse stringing kits comprising leather thongs and rope; karate equipment, namely, punching bags, kicking bags, punching pads, kicking pads, rib guards, punching and kicking targets, punching and kicking shields, punching and kicking blockers; hand wraps, jump robes; fish hook sharpener, fishing hooks, lures, rods, reels, line; snowboards, skis, ski poles, ski bindings, snowshoes; surfing bags, surfboards, bodyboards, surfboard wax; volleyballs, volleyball kneepads, volleyball elbow pads, ball pumps, volleyball nets; water-skis, wakeboards, water ski tow ropes, water polo balls, water polo nets, water-ski bindings, inflatable water tubes, knee boards, water-ski bags; baseballs, baseball bats, baseball gloves, catcher's masks, catcher's pads, baseball bases, baseball pitching machines; weight benches, in-line skates, punching dummies, weightlifting belts, weightlifting straps, footballs, kicking tees, football pads; golf balls, golf clubs, golf bags, golf club covers, golf tees, golf bag stands, non-motorized golf carts, skateboards; soccer balls, soccer goals, soccer ball bags softballs, softball bats, softball gloves, softball pitching machines; swimming cap, kickboard floatation devices for recreational use, ear plugs for swimming purposes, tennis racquets, tennis balls, tennis ball hoppers, tennis ball retrieval machines, tennis bag; athletic protective equipment, namely, wrist, thumb, back, hip, thigh, elbow, ankle and knee guards, pads and supports for use in skateboarding, ice hockey, and basketball | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |