USPTO serial 78978378
THE TUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3270383Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2007
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE TUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lauderdale Lakes, FL
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Perry
DAVID M PERRY BLANK ROME LLP1 LOGAN SQ FL 9PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Catalog, retail store, and online retail store services featuring pre-recorded music and video, downloadable pre-recorded music and video, books, book covers, literature, games and toys, clocks, magnets, frames, bookmarks, paperweights, posters, pens, pencils, prints, giftware, cards, artwork, and glassware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AGU Entertainment Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by THE TUBE MEDIA CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by THE TUBE MEDIA CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by THE TUBE MEDIA CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE TUBE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2006 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |