USPTO serial 78978906
E-SMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3305049Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2007
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with E-SMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc M. Gorelnik
Marc M. Gorelnik TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, 8th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Encoded smart cards containing programming used to protect data, documents and identities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |