USPTO serial 78978932
HB PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3673080Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2009
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HB PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole J. Renouard
Nicole J. Renouard WHYTE HIRSCHBOECK DUDEK SC555 E WELLS ST STE 1900MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3819UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | manufacture of parts for others for non-automotive vehicles designed for off-roadway use, namely, snowmobiles, agricultural vehicles, all terrain vehicles, utility vehicles, garden tractors and heavy-duty off-road construction vehicles, namely, disc brakes and disc brake parts, namely, pistons, brake calipers, brake covers, plugs, caliper castings, master cylinder castings, friction material, spring applied hydraulically released brake actuators, brake lines, brake cables, pedals, brake mounting devices, clutches and clutch parts, namely, clutch controls and clutch slave cylinders; custom manufacture of brakes and braking systems for snowmobiles, agricultural vehicles, all terrain vehicles, tractors and heavy-duty off-road construction vehicles, construction equipment, motorcycles, riding mowers, and utility vehicles, and parts therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 8, 2005 |
| 042 | custom design of brakes and braking systems for snowmobiles, agricultural vehicles, all terrain vehicles, tractors and heavy-duty off-road construction vehicles, construction equipment, motorcycles, riding mowers, and utility vehicles, and parts therefor; engineering services relating to the analysis, custom design and manufacture of brakes and braking systems for snowmobiles, agricultural vehicles, all terrain vehicles, tractors and heavy-duty off-road construction vehicles, construction equipment, motorcycles, riding mowers, and utility vehicles, and parts therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 8, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HB Performance Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HB Performance Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HB Performance Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HB PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 25, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2007 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |