USPTO serial 78979091
MITTAL STEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MITTAL STEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
Mark H. Tidman Baker Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Ave. N.W.Suite #1100Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Land, air and sea transport services provided by boat, ship, rail, tractor trailer and aircraft;shipping of cargo and freight; storage of ore, metals and alloys | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Galvanizing services for directly reducing iron; contract manufacturing in the field of steel; steel tempering; steel casting; contract manufacturing in the field of metal; metal tempering; metal casting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCELORMITTAL
- Other trademarks owned by Mittal Steel Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Mittal Steel Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named MITTAL STEEL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |