USPTO serial 78979149
HARBOUR HILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARBOUR HILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Bed pillows, decorative pillows, laundry hampers, non-metal robe hooks, fitted fabric furniture slipcovers, and bathroom shelves; shower curtain rings and hooks | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bed linens, namely, bed sheets, pillow cases, bed sheet sets, pillow shams, bed blankets, blanket throws, comforters, down comforters, quilts, duvets, duvet covers, coverlets, bed skirts, mattress pads; infant and juvenile bedding, namely bed linen, sheets, pillow cases, mattress pads, blankets; unfitted fabric furniture slipcovers; bath towels, bath sheets, wash cloths, beach towels; shower curtains; fabric window coverings and treatments, namely, window valances and sheer window panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | BATH RUGS, WOVEN RUGS, BATH MATS, BATHTUB MATS, AND RUG PADS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The TJX Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The TJX Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named HARBOUR HILL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |