USPTO serial 78979167
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
ADVANCED BEAUTY SOLUTIONS, LLC
LOS ANGELES, CA
ADVANCED BEAUTY SOLUTIONS, LLC
LOS ANGELES, CA
Encino, CA
ADVANCED BEAUTY SOLUTIONS, LLC
IRVINE, CA
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RGSU | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 18, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |