Drawing for MAMACITA

USPTO serial 78979525

MAMACITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAMACITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl M. Steins

KARL M. STEINS STEINS & ASSOCIATES, P.C.2333 CAMINO DEL RIO S STE 120SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-3607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Calendars; paper goods, namely, note paper, copier paper, stationery, stickers, writing paper, posters, pre-paid debit telephone calling cards, not magnetically encoded; decals, comic books, binders, personal daily organizers, envelopes, greeting cards, memo pads, notebooks, paper coasters, paper mats, bank checks, printed material, namely, printed forms; rubber stampsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 5, 2010TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Nov 5, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 5, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 17, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 18, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 23, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2007IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 7, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2007INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Nov 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance