USPTO serial 78979560
ABSOLUT ICEBAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABSOLUT ICEBAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
STOCKHOLM, SE
STOCKHOLM, SE
V&S VIN & SPRIT AKTIEBOLAG (publ)
Stockholm, SE
THE ABSOLUT COMPANY AKTIEBOLAG
STOCKHOLM, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joanne Ludovici-Lint
JOANNE LUDOVICI-LINT MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP600 13TH ST NW STE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing information in the fields of leisure, art, music, culture and movies; entertainment in the nature of on going multimedia programs in the fields of art, dining, music, design, culture, drama, action, hobbies, current events, comedy and leisure on global computer networks; production of multimedia motion picture movies and music; arranging and conducting entertainment exhibitions in the fields of entertainment, art, dining, music, culture and movies; arranging and conducting musical concerts; and arranging and conducting seminars, classes, exhibitions and workshops in the fields of entertainment, art, dining, music, culture, movies, alcohol and parties; providing an online, non-downloadable magazine in the fields of art, dining, music, design, culture, drama, action, hobbies, comedy, and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink, namely, restaurant, bar, cocktail lounge, catering and cafe services; and providing information in the field of dining | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by V&S VIN & SPRIT AKTIEBOLAG
- Other trademarks owned by V&S VIN & SPRIT AKTIEBOLAG
- Other trademarks owned by V&S VIN & SPRIT AKTIEBOLAG (publ)
- Other trademarks owned by THE ABSOLUT COMPANY AKTIEBOLAG
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named ABSOLUT ICEBAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |