USPTO serial 78979607
HYDRODYNAMICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3478333Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2008
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HYDRODYNAMICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Coronado, CA
Coronado, CA
Coronado, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter and publications, namely, manuals, printed guides in the field of surfboarding and snowboarding; posters, pressure sensitive stickers; books, newsletters, magazines in the field of surfboarding, and snowboarding; photographs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 2, 2007 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, bathing suits for men, bathing suits for women; caps; ski caps; headgear, namely, hats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 2, 2007 |
| 028 | Surfboards; snowboards; surfing fins; surfboard wax; surfboard leashes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 2, 2007 |
| 041 | Production of documentary films; DVD and video disc production services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 2, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kenvin, Richard
- Other trademarks owned by Kenvin, Richard
- Other trademarks owned by Kenvin, Richard
- Other trademarks owned by Elwell, John
- Other trademarks owned by Elwell, John
- Other trademarks owned by Elwell, John
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named HYDRODYNAMICA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |