USPTO serial 78979653
M+O
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M+O?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care products and cosmetics, namely, shaving balm, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving lotion, shower gel, non-medicated lip balm, bath gel, bath oil, non-medicated bath salts, beauty masks, body cream, body oil, body powder, bubble bath, cosmetics, namely, compacts, hand cream, night cream, skin cream, deodorant soap, deodorants and antiperspirants, emery boards, nail polish, facial scrubs, facial lotions, body lotions, makeup, essential oil for personal use, hair shampoo, skin lotions, skin moisturizers, skin soap, liquid soaps for hands, face and body, sun screen preparations and fragrances, namely, perfume and cologne | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; watches, namely, stop watches and wristwatches; money clips made of precious metal; clocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Athletic bags, baby carriers worn on the body, backpacks, beach bags, book bags, carry-on bags, diaper bags, duffel bags, overnight bags, tote bags, purses, briefcase-type portfolios, shoulder bags, and briefcases; wallets, business card cases, document cases, and credit card cases; cosmetic cases sold empty, toiletry cases sold empty; luggage, and luggage tags; umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, mail order services, and electronic retail store services using a global computer and communications network all in the field of luggage, backpacks, athletic bags, purses, wallets, umbrellas, perfume and fragrances, toiletries, cosmetics, personal care products, sunglasses, candles, toys, games, sporting goods, wristwatches, jewelry, stationery, posters, pictorial, art and color prints, calendars and travel diaries, pens, pencils, portfolios, notepads, greeting cards, note cards, audio players and recorders, compasses, thermometers for measuring environmental temperature and flashlights | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial, financially-related, electronic and online-implemented financial and card-implemented services, namely, charge card services, credit card services, issuing stored-value cards, electronic debit and credit transaction services, electronic cash transaction services, electronic payment services in the nature of electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data, point-of-sale and point-of-transaction electronic payment services in the nature of electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Retail Licensing Company
- Other trademarks owned by Retail Licensing Company
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named M+O
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |